RAM Optimization in Windows Is Not Required. Here is Why


ramoptimizer-thumbFor a lot of people, RAM can be a precious resource that must be managed carefully. This is especially true for all those with systems which may have only the minimum volume of RAM required to run their versions of Windows. It’s and a reason why many individuals intuitively elect to download and install programs that will manage this RAM and shave off as much of it as being possible from programs to produce the computer improve your speed. Assuming you have Windows Vista or any other version later than Windows XP, I’m going to explain to you a standard misconception about memory and how it’s optimized within your operating system.

RAM Optimization Tools Do Nothing (In More Recent Windows Versions)

Perhaps you’ve noticed a bit of a bump in speed when working with a memory optimizer in Windows. Or maybe it absolutely was all psychological auto-suggestion. Who knows? Well, let’s have a look at what goes on beneath the hood, shall we?

In Windows XP and earlier versions, in case your RAM was almost full, you'd probably experience a massive drop in performance, which required that you use some form of tool to reduce all the nasty stuff occupying your pc’s resources. In fact, you're limited to 4 GB until you used a 64-bit OS (which wasn’t available before XP). This still rings true, but it turned out more critical in older times when 64-bit os's were just starting to make their mark around the computing fray. RAM optimization was, to be hones, a necessity.


After Windows Vista arrived, RAM optimizers were commonplace. Vista was Windows 7′s deaf and crippled cousin, eating up resources being a frat party. People were alarmed at just how much RAM was being allocated out of the blue, and the only way to break the rules was with your tools. Unfortunately, they did this to no avail. This wasn’t truly the problem. Vista only agreed to be lousy, that’s all. RAM occupation had little to do with your problems, then when it did, it turned out because of a memory leak sprung unmanageable. The RAM optimization tool had become the world’s most popular do-nothing gimmick.

You see, Vista and later on versions of Windows started fetching memory from programs, pre-loading them into an addressing space when you ever started them. With predictive technology (called “Prefetch” or “Superfetch”), it took the programs you used essentially the most and slapped them on to your RAM without you ever understanding it. RAM optimization will just do away with this cached memory, which really has no effect on your effort, since Windows could have done this already once it determined that your particular memory’s full. It does this by 50 % ways: It either tells Windows to push all its running programs to work with the page file (which is way slower), or it gulps down the rest of your RAM so Windows flushes out the cache and then shrinks to its original size.

ram-optimizer-mem optimizer pro

Just like SSD optimization, RAM optimization is merely redundant. And just like SSD optimization, it could also be counter-productive, because…

It Can Even Slow Down Your Computer

You read that correctly. RAM optimization can create more problems of computer solves. Allow me to explain: Your most frequently used programs really need to load into memory prior to deciding to see them on the screen. The delay between one thing and also the other 's what causes that annoyance that you have to await them. Of course, your hard disk also helps slow this down further. But right this moment, we’re concentrating on RAM memory, not physical storage.

If you take optimization, simply delete the cached RAM with no relation to what you’re actually using. In Windows Vista and above, full RAM is great RAM. It’s RAM put to good use. If you’re using Windows 7, you can certainly see the caching process in the office:

ram optimizer-physical memory

That’s my computer’s physical memory details within the task manager’s “Performance” tab. Notice how I just have 5 MB of free ram. By the way, Windows 7 and newer versions explain to you your real RAM usage. Vista didn't do this, which triggered a lot of confusion about why most of the RAM is in use. If I use a RAM optimization tool at this time, programs like Chrome won’t load as fast.

The Conclusion?

If your personal computer is working slowly and occupying plenty of RAM with actively running applications (in other words, it does not have any room for caching anything), then go to your local computer hardware store and acquire yourself a RAM upgrade. Optimization only will do nothing (or worse, it'll just tire out your OS). Let us know what you think by typing up a comment!

Image credit: Hand Holding Ddr Memory from BigStockPhoto

Title Post: RAM Optimization in Windows Is Not Required. Here is Why
Rating: 100% based on 99998 ratings. 5 user reviews.
Author: SharedTutor

Thank you for visiting sharedtutor.com, If there is criticism and suggestions please leave a comment

About The Author

Someone who always wanted to know about the beauty of the world :)